Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

The best Noir crime books-09

Fifty Two Pick Up, Elmore Leonard, 1974

‘He could not get used to going to the girl’s apartment.’

Three Detroit villains try to blackmail Harry Stanton over his affair. But they’ve picked the wrong guy: tough factory owner Harry plays them off against each other – with the help of his angry wife.

Leonard has written dozens of amazing crime novels, an astonishing achievement. Hard to pick one, really, but I like this cause it’s the first I read, and cause the story is really focused. Leonard started off writing pulp westerns and he keeps those tropes, just shifts cast and locale – this book, for example, uses the western template of a group of outlaws threatening a homesteader who has to take them out without recourse to the law. Others feature bounty hunters, hitmen and the like – all acutely drawn.

Interesting to note that he’s one of those writers (like, say, JG Ballard), who’s getting more influential as time goes on. He’s proved way ahead of the curve of contemporary taste – he was writing snappy crim dialogue when Tarrantino was in shorts and creating a multi-racial cast way before the Wire. His pared down, conversational style has become the model everyone emulates – if you’re a writer, look for his laconic ‘ten rules of writing (a sample couple – ‘don’t start with the weather’; ‘leave out the bits people skip’).

 

The best Noir crime books-08

Deliverance, James Dickey (1970)

Now let’s you just drop them pants.

Alright, that’s not the first line, but it’s the one everyone knows, made famous by the film version. Indeed, that film is so well known it seems to have rather obscured the book, which is a shame, as it’s really a great piece of Hemingwayish, boys-own-adventure kind of writing.

Dickey, a poet, brings an exquisite sensibility to his story of four guys on a wilderness canoeing trip who have to fight for their lives after tangling with some horny hillbillies. The narrator seems half in love with Lewis, the survivalist who’s leading the expedition, but he has to take over when Lewis is injured, and it becomes a macho tale of city man discovering his hunter-killer side.

It’s all kept brilliantly simple – the whole thing takes place in a couple of days and there are only a dozen or so scenes. There’s something of ‘Heart of Darkness’ about it – both in subject – a river trip into the wilderness – and style – everything is described with hallucinatory clarity; a personal favourite is a passage on the narrator’s thoughts as he lays in ambush with a bow and arrow that goes on for ten pages.

I guess it isn’t very noir, but I would contend that it is certainly crime, and one of the lost classics of the genre. Shame Dickey didn’t write anything else that comes close to its freakish brilliance; after it, he got waylaid by poetry and booze.

 

The best Noir crime books-07

The Vanishing, Tim Krabbe (1984)

Steady as spaceships, the cabins full of tourists moved south over the long, broad road.

The Vanishing is a short sharp shock of a novel with a nightmarish ending. Rex Hofman is on holiday with his fiance Saskia, when she simply disappears. He can’t understand it, and years later he’s still restlessly looking for her – then a man called Lemorne calls, claiming to be her abductor. He offers a Faustian pact – you’ll find out what happened to her if you let me you do the same thing to you…

It’s very simple, split basically into four parts – the vanishing, Rex years later, a flashback that shows you Lemorne’s life up till he kidnapped Saskia, then what happens when the two men meet.

This is a gothic tragedy, full of twisted psychology, but it all seems horribly credible, and banal details are built up to make the horror seem real – great, for example, that Saskia disappears at the most mundane location, a petrol station.

And that ending still gives me shivers. Best not leave it in the bedroom – one of those books to keep in the fridge. And if you’re going to watch the film version, seek out the Dutch one from the 80s, not the terrible Hollywood remake.

 

The best Noir crime books-06

Miami Blues by Charles Willeford (1984)

Frederick J. Frenger, Jr, a blithe psychopath from California, asked the flight attendant in first class for another glass of champagne and some writing materials.

Willeford wrote pulp noir books throughout an eventful life (including time as a hobo and a tank commander) but he didn’t make his rep till he was in his Sixties, with four books about put-upon cop with bad teeth, Hoke Moseley. They’re not police procedurals though, more like westerns. This was the first.  

Freddie in ‘Miami Blues’ is one of fiction’s great outlaws, a psycho fresh from prison who flies into Miami with no idea but to go on a spree till he’s caught again. In chapter one he kills a Hare Krishna for hassling him at the airport, and this pointless murder sets Hoke on his trail – well kind of… the plot meanders all over the place. But it’s great fun to follow these two who are haphazardly locked together – the cop who’s hemmed in by the rules and the psycho who doesn’t have any.

The deadly, if oddly guileless, Freddie, his hick girlfriend Susan, and the unlucky Hoke are all outsiders, and make great guides to the city. Willeford has a killer way with detail and absurdity, and an anthropologist’s acute eye for Miami’s urban tribes, be they Cuban refugees or genteel retirees.

Lots of crime fiction gets set in Miami – maybe cause it’s so tacky and over-the-top – but for my money this is the best. Willeford deserves his increasing fame, shame he’s dead. Still, nice to see a guy doing his best work in his Sixties, means there’s hope for us all.

 

LA-LA land

LA-UCLA campus

So on Saturday I was taken to the UCLA campus for the Los Angeles Times Festival of Books. It was enormous. As well as stages, and halls where you could watch writers talk (for free), there were hundred of booths, mostly of bookshops and publishers – Mystery books, christian books, independent comic producers, the sinister sounding ‘immigration enforcement publications’, the Aynn Rand people (apparently some kind of cult), healing books, self help, a pet bookshop. More than a hundred thousand people visit over the two days.

There was a green room for the writers, which, I was pleased to see, had a massive buffet all day long. I met a bunch more people in here – some comic writers, and Paul Tremblay who’d written ‘the Little Sleep‘, about a narcoleptic private detective.

I did a panel. I didn’t know what to expect and was quite surprised to see about three hundred people in the hall.  Sarah Weinman was the moderator, and then me, the PI and this lady noir writer Denise Hamilton were asked questions and expected to talk. I tended to just answer the question, which took about two minutes, whereas the others produced beautiful extemporised essays that went on for ages. We were asked about crime and the social conscience, is crime writing all black and white or shades of grey, and should we write across class and race. I don’t think I was as polished and eloquent as the others.

I think my most coherent point was that whereas literary fiction tends to be psychological, and deal with one class, crime fiction tends to be sociological, and takes a vertical strip through society, from the lowest to the highest – as an example I cited Chandler, who would write about street hustlers and corrupt politicians in the same book.

Then there were questions from the floor, and they were all about the economy – should journalists give up their job and write novels? How will the Kindle affect publishing? I said I’d never even seen a Kindle and a guy held one up and said he’d just downloaded the first chapters of each of our books.

Indeed, if there was one thing I kept hearing, it was anxiety about a perceived crisis in publishing, particularly journalism. People just aren’t buying papers any more, apparently. There was a lot of talk about how to get money out of new media. It was telling that in the green room, the Amazon Kindle people had a table set aside for them in the middle and squatted there kind of aggressively, and no one else was talking to them. They were like emmisaries from this feared ogre.

I did a signing at the Mystery Bookshop. I got to sit next to David Benioff, who was this laid back guy who had got two million dollars for the Wolverine script. And he wrote the Kite Runner too. He was there to promote his new war novel. He signed a few more books than me, of course. He had been to Kashgar for the Kite Runner, cause since the writer’s strike there was now a clause in film contracts that the writer could demand to be flown once, first class, to the set. Someone kept up to him and said, ‘I read your screenplay!’ – Surely only in LA.

I went back to the hotel knackered about 6, and then went up to the resturant thinking that I would eat then sleep. But it was an off-puttingly posh restaurant that people had dressed up for, and the maitre’d said, if you want to eat alone we can squeeze you in there at the bar. So I had heard about this party and thought that trying to look for it was probably better than eating a posh meal on my own and there was bound to be food there. So I got a cab to Venice Beach and found the party, at Equator books, and fortunately they let me in, and I was like, shit there’s no food. The people I knew – Kortya and his agent – left straight away cause they had to catch an early plane. So I dulled my hunger with red wine and found some people to talk to, blathering at this playwright lady, Beth Henley, much of the time.

This important British writer was there – and he made a point of not talking to me, even though we’d been published together in an anthology once. I saw him at the festival the next day and he did it again – I’d been warned that LA was full of poeple puffed up with self-importance but the only one I met was British.

No, the yanks were lovely. It was striking how media savvy the writers were. it was like everyone was their own PR agent. I guess they’re very conscious that it’s a crowded market out there and you have to shout pretty loud to be heard. And I noticed that unlike, say, Hay, there was a real focus on shifting product.

Sunday was pretty much a wash out as I had been drunk, jet-lagged, often hungry and pumped with coffee for three days now. But I managed to drap myself out for a panel, which was really good, about the culture of fear. This one guy had a great argument, that the world now was so much more open to disruption, and that in those terms there were striking similarities between hedge fund managers and terrorists – which went down well. Good that when it came to questions, anyone who rambled was shouted at by other members of the audience to get on with it.

I suppose as a travel writer I should say what I thought of LA but I didn’t see much. The hotel was next to a freeway, and not only were there no shops within walking distance, walking as an activity was pretty much impossible. There were pavements around UCLA, but I saw more joggers on them than pedestrians. In the car I saw houses barrel past, no flats. So LA looked like endless suburbia. More like Japan than anything in Europe. There were a lot of palm trees. A sense of space. Huge cars. The few buses that I did see had an attachment on the front you could put your bike in, that was pretty cool. There was an earthquake button in the hotel lift. People talked about race a lot. They eat bacon that’s brittle as twigs.

Ok that was my LA adventure. I’m sure there are people for whom these jamborees are a grind, but it was my first and far as I’m concerned it was awesome – I word that I never heard anyone use, incidentally. Now I can dream about going back, this time as a two million dollar screenwriter.